Informal Autotheory I
machinic ontology - abstractions have their own being. In the vitalist sense I imagine and not phenomenology. Vitalism as such could be a rogue phenomenology skirting through German idealism with residuals.
Abstraction as being allows for an umwelt of abstracts. Consciousness may be being metricised right now. Consciousness is an abstraction. Consciousness as abstraction may be abstract being in the vitalist sense. Not the Heidegger overtake of Aristotle B b being. Is vitalism, vitalist abstract being, Aristotelian without Heidegger? An ontics sans the existential gravitas of the Heideggerian frame project? Like a jeweler pincer extraction?
Vitalist Abstraction is different to the existential tradition. But being is an abstraction as well in whatever sense. Vitalist ontics. Perhaps Heidegger ground death equipmentality etc could be put through a transformative process of vitalising. The rationalist turn proffers Plato and formalism. As likely a sloughing off of the existential grounding of heidegger and his own project of authenticity and its surrounds qua phenomenological apperception.
What I have now is a network understanding. This person not right this person not wrong but more like this happened, this was thought, this was made, and then that got thought, which is similar to something thought earlier later. Works, either human or ambiental in a relationalism that is multifield, multicausal but not necessarily all connected. And in this vocal/subvocal/2nd subvocal (new alter) you could imagine Fawltyesque bravado. I like a laugh. But all the abstract concepts including conceptuality can be put through a vitalist transformation. Vibin'. Though if I work in mechanics this is probably a great time to reference a post-Australian I like: "I wish Deleuze talked about actual machines" lol
Abstraction as being allows for an umwelt of abstracts. Consciousness may be being metricised right now. Consciousness is an abstraction. Consciousness as abstraction may be abstract being in the vitalist sense. Not the Heidegger overtake of Aristotle B b being. Is vitalism, vitalist abstract being, Aristotelian without Heidegger? An ontics sans the existential gravitas of the Heideggerian frame project? Like a jeweler pincer extraction?
Vitalist Abstraction is different to the existential tradition. But being is an abstraction as well in whatever sense. Vitalist ontics. Perhaps Heidegger ground death equipmentality etc could be put through a transformative process of vitalising. The rationalist turn proffers Plato and formalism. As likely a sloughing off of the existential grounding of heidegger and his own project of authenticity and its surrounds qua phenomenological apperception.
What I have now is a network understanding. This person not right this person not wrong but more like this happened, this was thought, this was made, and then that got thought, which is similar to something thought earlier later. Works, either human or ambiental in a relationalism that is multifield, multicausal but not necessarily all connected. And in this vocal/subvocal/2nd subvocal (new alter) you could imagine Fawltyesque bravado. I like a laugh. But all the abstract concepts including conceptuality can be put through a vitalist transformation. Vibin'. Though if I work in mechanics this is probably a great time to reference a post-Australian I like: "I wish Deleuze talked about actual machines" lol
