Informal Theory: Discursive vectors on imperfect understanding affect idea
Threshold affect via personal philosophical disjunctions. The whole thing of being wrong that includes anxiety, histories of bad encounters due to academic wrong (humiliation, bullying, punishment), and then liminal states from the normate. Obviously non normative bioethics is a peak to allow social difference.
As current jokes on Kant are being thrown by the best of us, I return to that humiliation set as even deleuze was made kantian of.
Perhaps the world ends when western philosophy is diagnosed as only Kantian even by Alfred north Whitehead.
All that work. The equilibria of dynamic took a pothole path. Is the desiring machine and the bricoleur of Althusser stuck together? Humanism gets destabilised and made malleable material-like. Immanence though does not escape representation. Some get erased or dehierarchalised into a non humanism. Posthumanism holds a germ of the dehumanised. It's an irritant. Non humanism as flattened surface of conceptual ethic and metaphysics
As current jokes on Kant are being thrown by the best of us, I return to that humiliation set as even deleuze was made kantian of.
Perhaps the world ends when western philosophy is diagnosed as only Kantian even by Alfred north Whitehead.
All that work. The equilibria of dynamic took a pothole path. Is the desiring machine and the bricoleur of Althusser stuck together? Humanism gets destabilised and made malleable material-like. Immanence though does not escape representation. Some get erased or dehierarchalised into a non humanism. Posthumanism holds a germ of the dehumanised. It's an irritant. Non humanism as flattened surface of conceptual ethic and metaphysics
