Low theory on high functioning MH profile
High functioning is a term levied at the mentally ill. Somehow the organic economic opulence of a psyche is scarred beyond the placeholder for forces, thresholds, attitudes, intentions and by extension, behavior and presentation.
If one is devoid of the congruent conformal psyche then functioning is a secondary skeletal type of biomechanic. On the lateral the norm can too present a biomechanistic profile. One thinks in folk terms of cultural muscularity almost reified with physical fitness culture, legitimated by presentation values, and the cement of norms themselves such as Jesuits and other muscular theologies. Cultural muscularity is accepted as a sexualized dialogic and ensuing gaunt traits evolutionism of dominance. Medicine still buys into this as cultural prescription.
Any medical Munchausen by proxy condescension regards referential beliefs and the reflexivity of practitioners to levy transactional biomechanical dominance value from this strips the patient of their outlier diverse psyche as distinct organic economic opulence. The connection to the starry dynamo. And unfolding from that any involved metaphysics.
We are asked to superpose with the population average. The high functioning in me praises the high functioning in you perhaps. That's not a population average typical encounter even without the sly namastes.
Stripped to biomechanical enframing I think of the low functioning. In the de-psychologised appraisals as function I still can generate the idealised infinite rapport of functional dynamos. This machine loves, this machine makes a sound, this function produces.
What it doesn't produce is acknowledgement of the extrinsic world to conformal seamless e: gutters and downspouts. f: connective elegance. Somewhere a fuck is not given but spoken. The natural formation akin to this is beyond me at the moment in a few senses but some irregular formations should do. Like a dour Moore curvilinear statue. Rotund. Would that not transcend the high function to some congruent economic opulence? Now, wouldn't it?
