How Can Anyone Be A Platonist - convo between Dave Thomas and ARP

How can anyone be a Platonist in this day and age?
Philosophy is synonymous with delusional thinking more often then not...

11 comments

Like

CommentShare

Comments

• 

  Dave Thomas Just because you can imagine and synthesize fictionally or as an extension to what is known and label the result as potential or probable or not, there is no evidence of transcendence in such activities.

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 9h
• 

  Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot Is evidence axiomatic?

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 3h
  • 

    Dave Thomas The criteria for it can be

    1

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot At the meta-axiomatic lies the can, the potential and the probable?

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot Criterion is a functionalist molecularity in one way among many

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot And even the classificatory of axiomatics could be manifold

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Dave Thomas deleuze?

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot Yes but I can't be helped to be influenced by Hofstadter and Gödel too

    2

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot May I share this on my blog?